I have a chip on my shoulder, and I need to do a little venting. So bear with me please.
As an unschooling parent, I get tired of hearing about socialization – as in: “Yes, I know that Kodiak and Jupiter are doing fine and you’re doing a good job with them, but since they’re not in school, I just worry about their socialization.” I really don’t like that word, “socialization”. When I hear, “Hey Minke, how’s the kids’ socialization going?”, it sounds to me like, “Hey Minke, how’s the meat processing going?” My kids are not objects in need of having something done to them.
Allow me to explain. For starters, the word socialization implies the verb: socialize. But in this case the verb is used in its transitive sense rather than as an active verb. There’s a difference between saying, “Bob goes to his local pub after work to socialize,” (active verb) and alternately saying, “Bob is being sent to prison to be socialized (rehabilitated)” (transitive verb). When we talk about how school socializes our children, we’re using the transitive form of the verb, meaning we are doing something to the children. Maybe you think I’m gnit-picking here, but stay with me. This is very central to what unschooling is all about… and why I’m thankful to Joy for winning me over to the concept… and why I’m very glad not to have our kids in school.
Somehow, I think, a lot of people unconsciously equate school with civilization itself. It’s like they think that homeschool kids will turn into feral children or something if they aren’t getting “socialized” in a classroom environment. These people will cling to this ridiculous notion despite all the evidence right before their eyes. They may know your children intimately, or even be related to them… and they see with their own eyes that your kids have perfectly good social skills… and still they will worry about the lack of “socialization”.
Does this even make the slightest bit of sense? Really? State-run classroom style education for children is a very recent invention. Schools weren’t really a wide-spread phenomenon before the Mid-19th Century. Before that, were kids doomed to become feral children because of a lack of school socialization? (rhetorical question) Can anyone point to any evidence whatsoever that social behavior and interpersonal skills of children have actually improved since the invention of school? Seriously, the biggest things parents, students, and teachers worry about in schools are student violence and anti-social behavior. Is that the kind of socialization we’re missing out on by unschooling?
Yes, I think school has a function in our society. I support the existence and funding of public schools. It’s part of a wide range of options that I think should be available to all children. I just don’t think that school should be the only option. Nor do I think it’s necessarily the best option for most kids. And trying to make an argument in favor of school on the basis of “socialization” is a farce if you take the time to deconstruct the idea.
How much socializing is there really time for in a classroom? School kids spend the bulk of their day sitting silently in a classroom listening to or ignoring lectures. This is what the school experience amounts to really: sitting silently in a classroom almost all day long. Your chances to socialize are really limited to lunch, recess if you get one, and the bus to and from school if you take it. All of that social time is outside the confines of what school actually is. So how exactly is the school itself providing social time? The obvious answer is that it really isn’t providing social time at all in most cases.
So what then is this mysterious “socialization” that school provides? This gets back to my original point: socialization in this context is something the school does to the child rather than the child actually doing the socializing. What is this thing that the schools are doing to the children? What they were designed to do: indoctrination. Given that most schools are run by governments, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out what the agenda of that indoctrination might entail. At some point I will compile references about the origins of public school and this agenda of indoctrination. But I don’t want to get sidebarred with that right now. This post will already be long enough as it is. It’s fairly common, I think, for people to acknowledge this agenda of indoctrination, and even admit to the more egregiously brain-washing aspects of it, but still condone it due to what they see as the “upside” of the whole process. They might say, “Yes, it’s true that the schools fill you with loads of propaganda about how great the rulers of the country are and how noble we were in every war we ever fought, etc, etc. But even so, at least they’re instilling good moral virtues and teaching the benefit of honest work….” This will segue quite nicely to a discussion of why I think unschooling’s approach is superior to the school notion of “socialization”.
To the topic of “instilling virtues”, let me offer this quote from Aristotle, “Moral excellence comes about as a result of habit. We become just by doing just acts, temperate by doing temperate acts, brave by doing brave acts. ” In other words, we don’t act good because we have good virtues; we have good virtues because we act good. So the idea that children will act virtuous as a result of pedagogy is really wishful thinking. In reality, we learn virtuous behavior the same way we learn everything – through practice. This is the unschooling way to doing everything. It is an active approach to life rather than a passive, sit-silently-in-a-classroom-and-listen-to-lectures approach to life. At its best, unschooling frees the child to use all of her natural faculties to investigate, experiment, and experience the world around her without being encumbered by the external agenda of a pedagogue. The biggest form of that encumbrance is by way of the principle lesson taught throughout the entire school experience: the lesson of obedience. If school serves any purpose at all, it is to teach you to be obedient. The knowledge you are allowed to gain in school comes at the price of your obedience. While unschooling doesn’t exclude this dynamic from happening too, it’s not the actually purpose of unschooling. At least it’s contrary to my purpose in unschooling. I want my children to continue to grow and live as autonomous individuals. I want them to choose their own paths in life and enjoy taking them.
Kodiak and Jupiter socialize all the time. They socialize with each other, and with me and with their mother, with friends of all different ages (as opposed to age segregation that you get in school), and with new people they meet every day out in the real world instead of a classroom. They socialize. They aren’t being socialized.
A woman I know adopted a girl last year that was in foster care and public school. The girl was bright and outgoing but struggling in school. The problem was that she kept getting in trouble in school for talking too much. Shortly after adopting the girl and learning about these school problems, the new mom decided their best option would be to homeschool. It wasn’t something she previously had imagined doing, but her instinct told her that this would be the best thing for her new daughter. The point is that the girl was getting in trouble in school for trying to socialize. So much for the idea of school socialization! The question is, what was so wrong with the girl’s desire to socialize? Doesn’t that desire seem perfectly natural to you? I mean, here’s a young girl that’s been taken away from her biological family, put into foster care and moved around between schools. Of course she’s going to want and need social connections with people. There’s nothing pathological or deviant about it that warrants punishment. But that’s the approach of the school system. One size fits all. What is deviant in my estimation, is the idea that a young girl should be cut off from her natural social need to connect with other people… to feel like she belongs… to know that there are people who care for her and that she’s not isolated in a rigid system she has no control over. So like I said, her new mom decided to homeschool (with a definite unschool approach, I’m happy to say) and it’s working out well for them. How ironic that taking an extroverted girl out of the supposedly social environment of school to become a homeschooled, only-child actually increased her opportunity to socialize! And most importantly for her, she’s now spending the bulk of her time getting the steady nurturing attention of someone invested in her emotional wellbeing (her mom) rather than at the mercy of people who consider her a burden in their job as a teacher or social worker.
Maybe I’ll leave it there for now. I think I’ve made my point. Either you get it or you don’t.
- Minke